Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Norman Swan?

Our score: 8 out of 10. He's spent decades explaining health plainly, and the marks against him are one apologised-for error and a contested stance on ME/CFS.

Norman Swan was born Norman Swirsky in Glasgow in 1953. His family fell into poverty after the family car business went bankrupt, which he says left him with a lasting fear of losing everything. He wanted to be an actor, studied medicine instead, trained in paediatrics, then moved to Australia and joined the ABC in 1982.

He ran ABC Radio National for three years in the 1990s and has collected several awards along the way, including a Gold Walkley. By the pandemic he was the calm voice a lot of Australians leaned on, co-hosting the daily Coronacast podcast. He says the aim was to translate complex science into plain terms, using evidence and a range of experts, and to correct mistakes quickly.

The big stoush came in November 2022. On ABC News he said it was “too much of a coincidence” that Shane Warne and Labor Senator Kimberley Kitching died soon after Covid infections. Reporting at the time said Kitching had never had Covid and Warne's death hasn't been officially linked to the virus. Swan apologised, including to Kitching's husband, saying he had “clearly made an error” he deeply regretted, while radio host Ben Fordham slammed the ABC for still giving him a platform.

That's the one real stain, and it matters because he trades on being careful. But the apology was quick and specific, and it isn't the start of a slide. There's no sign in what we read of him drifting into conspiracy theories, anti-vax talk or culture-war grifting. Through the pandemic he drew fire from News Corp columnists and epidemiologists on Twitter, which is a different thing.

The other criticism comes from ME/CFS patient advocates. A 2023 petition over a Coronacast episode argued his remarks on ME/CFS were too brief and lacked nuance. An ABC spokesperson said the segment had made clear it was a controversial area, and that his comments matched Victorian Health Department messaging. We couldn't find a ruling either way, so it's a live disagreement over how a hard topic was covered, not a finding of wrongdoing.

On the harm check, nothing turned up on trans people, women, migrants or climate in his own words. He co-founded Tonic Media Network, a health channel for waiting rooms, and in 2023 it became the first media company to publicly back the Yes vote in the Voice referendum. He said it wouldn't take money from the No campaign and that the Voice had a health and scientific angle that hadn't been well articulated. The Australian newspaper has also questioned his Tonic directorship, but we couldn't open that piece, so we've left it out.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.