Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Michelle Obama?

Our score: 9 out of 10. Consistent on the right side for years, with LGBTQ+ people, immigrants and fairness, and nothing nasty turned up; the only knock is a thin public paper trail on her causes.

Michelle Robinson grew up in a working-class family on Chicago's South Side, then went to Princeton and Harvard Law at a time when both places were racially charged. She landed at a big Chicago law firm, which is where she met a summer associate called Barack. The path from there to the White House is the one most people know, and she carried the South Side with her the whole way.

The ugliest story of her year was not of her making. In February, a video shared on Trump's Truth Social account showed the Obamas' faces on apes, folded into a clip pushing false 2020 election claims. Republican senator Tim Scott called it racist and urged its removal, the White House first dismissed the outrage as fake and then blamed a staffer, and it was deleted within hours. CNN reported no response from the Obamas, and the post drew no apology.

On the harm check, the record is clean. At Jackson State University in 2016 she spoke against anti-trans bathroom bills, warning about how easy it is to single out a small group, and urged people to stand side by side with their LGBTQ+ neighbours. In 2025 she said deportations were not being made with courts and due process, and that what was happening to immigrants kept her up at night. She did not name Trump while saying it.

The recent stoush is a bit of a nothing-burger. At the Obama Presidential Center opening she praised Barack, said the place was grounded in their stories but had never been about them, and urged people to speak up and vote. The next day, asked on Good Morning America for a one-word picture of her next chapter, she said “Me”. Commentators including Danny De Urbina took it as self-focus, and Stephen Miller of the Spectator said she really hates him. Where you land probably depends on whether you hear a woman claiming some time for herself or something sour.

The good stuff is well covered in the wider record, but the dated pages I read were thin on specifics. What I could confirm is a public life spent on the platform side: a weekly podcast with her brother, launched in 2025, taking listeners' questions about life's challenges. She framed it with a nod to complicated and confusing times, and a promise of plenty of opinions.

On the good-person test, nothing turned up: no court cases, no credible misconduct allegations, no stories of her treating staff badly. The online lawsuit rumours I came across, including ones involving a UFC fighter, were called fabricated by fact-checkers in the search results, and that's tabloid territory. That's honestly the whole list, which is itself a pretty rare result for someone this famous.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.