Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Keanu Reeves?

Our score: 8 out of 10. Years of reported quiet generosity and no harmful words or company found, held back only by his letter backing a convicted friend.

Keanu Reeves has been Hollywood's designated nice guy for so long that this year's big Apple TV film, Outcome, is built around sending the image up. He plays a famous actor on an apology tour after a blackmailer threatens him, and one reviewer said his awkward apologies suit a character who has rarely taken responsibility. It takes a fair bit of confidence to poke fun at your own halo.

On the harm check, we found nothing nasty. No campaigning against trans or LGBTQ+ people, no conspiracy-theory slide, no climate or vaccine nonsense, and no run of projects with the usual culture-war studios. We couldn't open a solid, well-sourced record of his views on politics or LGBTQ+ causes, so we're not claiming an ally badge for him. The internet is full of content-farm pages saying he is a big activist, and we've ignored them. It's a clean pass, but the record on his stance is thin.

The stoush is the Rinsch letter. Rinsch, who directed Reeves in 47 Ronin, was convicted in December of wire fraud, money laundering and illegal transactions over Netflix money meant for an unfinished series. Prosecutors alleged the cash went on luxury cars, mattresses and crypto. Reeves wrote to the judge calling him an “exceptional artist” and hoping the sentence might be tempered with “leniency and mercy as well as justice.” He also said he wasn't a therapist and didn't mean to diminish the crimes.

Judge Jed Rakoff then gave Rinsch 2.5 years, half what prosecutors wanted. He said mental health problems may explain some of the excesses but didn't undo the finding that Rinsch intended to deceive Netflix. Rinsch's lawyer says they'll appeal. Whether you read Reeves's letter as a friend standing by a mate or as soft-pedalling a rort is up to you. It's one contested call in a long record of decency.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.