Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Itsunori Onodera?

Our score: 5 out of 10. No harmful words or acts found and a steady public record, but too little on LGBTQ+ and social issues to score higher.

Itsunori Onodera is a Liberal Democratic Party veteran from Miyagi, in Japan's north-east. He served as defence minister twice under Shinzo Abe, first from 2012 to 2014 and again from 2017 to 2018. These days he's one of the party's senior fixers, and he was handed the LDP's tax commission in October 2025.

That tax job tells you how he's seen inside the party. Reporting at the time said Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi was counting on his bargaining skills to land an early deal with coalition and opposition partners. She said she wanted him to play an active role. A negotiator, then, not a firebrand.

His second stint as defence minister had a rough patch. In 2018 the ministry turned up Iraq-deployment activity logs it had earlier said it couldn't find. Onodera said he wasn't told for about two and a half months, denied any concealment and rejected claims the troops had been sent to combat zones. That's the closest thing to a stain in what I read, and it's a bureaucratic row, not a personal one.

On the harm test, honestly, the file is thin. I found no remarks from him demeaning LGBTQ+ people, women, migrants or anyone else, and nothing on climate denial or conspiracy talk. But I also found nothing on where he stands on same-sex marriage or related laws, so I can't call it a clean pass. His public voice is about security, tariffs and tax.

His recent record is hawkish but measured. In December 2025 he went on TV and called avoiding debate on Japan's three non-nuclear principles irresponsible. Whether you read that as sensible discussion or a worrying step depends on your view of nuclear policy. In April 2025 in Washington he urged Donald Trump to reconsider tariffs, warning they could damage regional security.

I didn't find any verified charity work or personal kindnesses to put in the good column, so I won't invent any. He has no court cases or misconduct allegations that I could find. For a long-serving politician, that's a quiet record, which counts for something.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.