Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Gina Rinehart?

Our score: 4 out of 10. Big philanthropy and honours on one side; a netball walk-out, a plane for One Nation and a push against net zero on the other.

Gina Rinehart runs Hancock Prospecting, the iron ore empire her father Lang Hancock founded. She is Australia's best-known mining billionaire, and in the 2022 honours she was made an Officer of the Order of Australia for service to mining, philanthropy and sport. The public record I could open on her early life is thin, so this one is about what she has done as a boss and a donor.

In the courts, her company has had a long run of fights with business rivals. In April 2026 the WA Supreme Court found heirs of Peter Wright and Don Rhodes were entitled to some of their royalty claims from Hope Downs, in a 1655-page judgment, with hundreds of millions possibly payable. It also dismissed Wright Prospecting's claim to a half share of some deposits. Hancock has appealed most of the orders and says it is the legitimate owner of the assets.

On the harm check, nothing I found has her speaking against LGBTQ+ people or trans rights. Her politics are another matter: in August 2025 she urged Australia to drop its net zero goal, and around the 2025 election she said she wanted Trump-style reforms. A company linked to her gave One Nation a Cirrus G7 plane in April 2026, and Treasurer Jim Chalmers called Pauline Hanson a “wholly owned subsidiary” of Rinehart. That is his line, not hers, and Rinehart's side has not been quoted in what I read.

Not every attack on her sticks. In August 2026 the ABC corrected an on-air claim that she wanted Australians to work for $2 a day, calling it inaccurate. Hancock Prospecting said her 2012 comments were about competing with lower-cost overseas producers. A false claim aimed at her doesn't count against her here, only what she has said and done herself.

The good stuff is real. Her company has pledged $200 million to house homeless veterans, announced in April 2026, and she has long backed Olympic sports. The honours citation names her community philanthropy and her patronage of sport. That is a record of giving, even if you wish some of the money went elsewhere.

So: not a villain, not a hero. The generosity is real and the court record is mostly commercial rivalry. But the netball episode, the fight against net zero and the plane for One Nation make it hard to call her someone we'd cheer without reservations. We'd give her credit for the veterans pledge and keep one eyebrow raised.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.