Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Emily D. Baker?

Our score: 6 out of 10. A clean record on harm and no scandals found, but too little is known about her off-screen to score higher.

Emily D. Baker is a former Los Angeles County deputy district attorney who left the job in 2020 and turned to legal commentary on YouTube. Her channel, TheEmilyDBaker, now has around 800,000 subscribers and covers the big, messy trials: Murdaugh, Karen Read, Gwyneth Paltrow's ski-crash suit, the Rust case and Depp v. Heard.

She started in the pandemic year as a bit of a diversion. The ABA Journal reported in 2021 that she had been doing pop-culture legal commentary since 2020, after representing small online businesses. She told the Journal she thinks YouTube is a good place to teach how the law works.

The Depp v. Heard trial was her breakout. The LA Times reported that her livestream at one point out-drew some mainstream outlets, her channel passed 500,000 subscribers, and her podcast hit number one in US entertainment news on Apple Podcasts. She told the paper “I'm not a journalist, I'm a legal analyst.”

That trial also brought the only real heat we found. Critics have called her biased, accused her of profiting from domestic violence, and questioned her professionalism over her purple hair and swearing. She says she avoids exploitative coverage and has not monetised some videos. That's criticism of her style and business model, not an allegation of anything nasty, and where you land depends on how you feel about trial-for-profit content.

On the harm check, we searched her name against LGBTQ+ and trans issues, women, Trump, vaccines, climate and migrants and found nothing from her. No harmful posts, no culture-war grift, no dodgy co-stars or studios. That is an absence of evidence, not a glowing character reference, and we can't say what she thinks on those topics because she hasn't said it where we could find it.

On how she treats people, nothing turned up either: no court cases against her, no staff or co-worker complaints, no accusations. The CJR describes her long videos, some up to seven hours, as an effort to make courtrooms less intimidating, and she says her goal is “to keep an open mind.” We found no specific charity work, so the good stuff here is mostly public education.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.