Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like David Lammy?

Our score: 7 out of 10. Decent and on the right side of the big stuff, but his Gaza record and justice reforms are contested, and we couldn't open his full voting record.

He studied law, then did a Harvard Law master's in 1997 and worked as a lawyer in San Francisco before winning Tottenham at 27 in 2000. He was a junior minister under Blair, then spent years as a backbencher known for campaigning on Windrush, Grenfell and race in the justice system. He became Foreign Secretary in July 2024, and Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary in September 2025.

On the harm test, the trans rights record is the one to check. At a 2021 Labour conference fringe he said there were “dinosaurs on the right” and in his own party who wanted to “hoard rights”. He said he was proud of helping pass the Gender Recognition Act 2004, and that it needed updating. He also said Labour shouldn't be inflaming a very small minority group. We found no campaigning against LGBTQ+ people, women or migrants from him.

The recent fight was over jury trials. As Justice Secretary he pushed to move the courts away from juries to tackle the backlog, which LBC calls a big and divisive step. Then Starmer's era ended and Burnham took over. Lammy left on 20 July and said he would back the government from the backbenches.

The good stuff is real. He is best known for campaigning for Windrush generation victims and for Grenfell Tower victims, and for work on race in the criminal justice system. As Foreign Secretary he pressed for the UK to recognise Palestinian statehood. How that sat with his Gaza and arms policy depends on whether you read it as principle or as too little, too late.

The gaps: the voting-record page was rate-limited when we tried to open it, so we haven't checked his votes issue by issue, and nothing in this card rests on them. Several controversies from his time in government are only covered in sources we couldn't open, so we've left them out. From what we could read, he's a decent bloke whose main sins are the ordinary ones of a long political career.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.