Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Nikon?

Japanese maker of cameras, lenses, chip-making lithography machines and microscopes, based in Tokyo.

Our score: 6 out of 10. A solid, long-running maker with real climate targets and no recent scandals in what we found. The big losses and the old Swiss cartel fine stop us rating it higher.

Nikon is one of Japan's best-known camera makers. It also sells chip-making equipment and microscopes. Its year to March 2026 was rough. One report put sales at about JPY 677bn, down from JPY 715bn a year earlier. Headlines gave different loss figures, so we won't quote one.

On pay, the search summary says executive bonuses and performance-linked stock pay for the top two executives were not paid for that year. That looks like leadership taking some of the hit.

On the legal side, we found old trouble. Its Swiss arm lost an appeal over a competition ruling, and Nikon paid a fine of about CHF 12 million. In the chip-machine patent fight with ASML and Zeiss, the two paid Nikon €150 million to settle in 2019.

On climate, Nikon's own reports describe an SBTi-certified target to cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 71.4% from fiscal 2013 by fiscal 2030. It also has a longer-term carbon-neutral goal. We'd call that decent, but they are company claims.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.