Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde?

A character from Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886)

Our score: 3 out of 10. Jekyll means well and is brilliant, but his vanity and secrecy cause real harm. Hyde is a menace. We wouldn't back this pair.

Robert Louis Stevenson's novella is set in foggy Victorian London. The lawyer Utterson investigates after hearing of Edward Hyde, a cruel and repellent man who has a strange hold over his old friend, the respected Dr Henry Jekyll. Jekyll has even changed his will in Hyde's favour.

Jekyll is well liked, charitable and clever, but he is restless under the pressure to keep up a flawless public image. Hyde seems to be everything that image is not: unpredictable, brutal and unwilling to answer for what he does. Together they make a study in hypocrisy and the darker side of human nature.

The twist is that they are the same man. Jekyll takes a potion that lets him become Hyde and act on his worst urges without consequence. He thinks he can control it, but the changes begin to happen on their own, and his choice to keep experimenting rather than stop costs others dearly. That choice is why he scores low despite his good intentions.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.