Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Carrie Lam?

Our score: 3 out of 10. Mixed on both tests: a sanctioned record and a no on same-sex marriage, but too little verified on the other side to go higher.

Carrie Lam is the career civil servant who rose to be Chief Executive of Hong Kong, the city's top job. Fair warning: most of the big outlets we tried to open were blocked or rate-limited on our end, so this is a lighter file than we'd like. We've kept to what we could read in full.

Her name is tied to the 2019 extradition bill. The US Treasury cited her attempt to pass it when it sanctioned her in August 2020. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said it caused “a series of massive opposition demonstrations in Hong Kong”. The sanctions also cited her part in developing and implementing the national security law. The report we opened carries no response from her.

On the harm check, the clearest thing we could read in full is her answer on same-sex marriage. At a Bloomberg business summit on 21 March 2019, she said it wasn't coming: “I'm afraid not. This remains a very controversial issue in Hong Kong.” That's a refusal to move rather than a campaign against LGBTQ+ people, and we found no attack on trans people in what we read. A government that says no to marriage equality still isn't one we'd cheer for.

We found nothing we could verify from her on women, migrants, vaccines or the climate. That's a gap in our reading, not a clean bill of health. The company she kept in government is the other side of the ledger: she was sanctioned by the US for her part in the extradition bill and the national security law, which is a public-record fact, not a smear.

Nothing new on her lately that we could confirm. She left office in 2022, and the 2026-dated pages that came up in our searches turned out to be misdated or about other things. The latest pages we could open are her 2019 and 2020 stories.

On the good stuff, honestly, we couldn't verify any charity or kind acts in the pages we could read in full. A long public-service career is on the record, but we haven't got the evidence to turn that into real credit here. If you know of something, it would change the picture.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.