Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Bukayo Saka?

Our score: 8 out of 10. Decent record, funded housing for quake-hit families and handled online hate with grace, but I found little on his own views either way.

Let's be upfront: this one is a thin file, because several of the pages I tried to open were blocked. Everything below rests on what I could source, and the gaps are flagged.

The latest is a ripper. At the 2026 World Cup England lost a semi-final to Argentina, then beat France 6-4 in the third-place play-off, and Saka bagged a hat-trick, finishing with a late penalty. Manager Thomas Tuchel said England struggled to feel proud of third because they wanted the final.

On the harm test, I searched his name against LGBTQ+ issues, women, climate and politics and found no harmful statements, no campaigns and no questionable company. I also found no statements from him on those causes, so this is a pass on a clean record, not a ringing endorsement.

The rest of the 2026 coverage is football noise: form, fitness and benching debates, which say nothing about his character. Weigh it up and he is a pass on both tests, and an easy one to cheer for.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.