Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Brian Cox?

Our score: 8 out of 10. Nothing harmful turned up and plenty of public-good advocacy, but the record on LGBTQ+ topics is thin, so it stops short of the top.

Brian Cox is the particle physicist who made the cosmos a primetime thing, fronting series like Universe and The Planets while holding down a professor's job at the University of Manchester. This month he picked up the 2026 Stephen Hawking Medal for Science Communication, presented by Starmus co-founders Brian May and Garik Israelian.

The live fight is over money. When the UK's science funding body cut particle, nuclear and astrophysics grants this year, Cox said on X the cuts would be devastating and had not been thought through. He later told the Guardian the impact amounted to “destruction of the future”.

He is not alone: the Commons science committee chair called the cuts wholly unacceptable, while the science minister called the missed funding deadline a mistake and said postdoc money is still available. The funding body's line is that its training budget is rising. Cox has been on this beat for more than a decade, having criticised research cuts back in 2014 too.

On the harm check, nothing nasty turned up. On the planet, he has called for a CERN-style international body for the environment, and in 2016 he welcomed Australia reinvesting in climate research. Fair warning though: our searches found nothing from him on LGBTQ+ or trans issues, so that one is silence rather than a tick.

On the good-person side the record is quiet, which is a compliment. We found no court outcomes, regulator rulings or credible allegations about him, though a couple of tabloid-style items about old tweets were not something we could verify, so we left them out.

The good stuff is mostly what he does best: getting people excited about physics and defending the funding that keeps the next generation of scientists employed. That is a decent use of a famous face, even if it is not the same as campaigning for LGBTQ+ people directly.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.