Do we like them?

Would we support them? Type any of these:

You get the goss with a verdict, a score out of 10, and the sources to check us.

Do we like Bernard Arnault?

Our score: 4 out of 10. No harmful words about LGBTQ+ people turned up and there is some real giving, but the good-person record is mixed, with a tax ruling, a spy-chief case in his orbit and press-control complaints.

Arnault runs LVMH, the group behind Louis Vuitton, Dior and Sephora, and his family now holds about half of it. His five children run fashion houses and sit in the succession frame, and he has told shareholders that retirement talk can wait. He is the sort of figure who gets a six-part newspaper series about his dynasty.

The spy-chief saga is the one that sticks. Former French intelligence chief Bernard Squarcini was convicted in March 2025 of providing illegal services to LVMH, including surveillance of journalist François Ruffin and the newspaper Fakir. Arnault was never charged, and told the court he was completely unaware of any scheme. That is his account, and the court's finding was about Squarcini, not him. But it happened on his company's watch.

Then there is the press. In 2024 he banned LVMH staff from talking to certain French outlets, according to the Financial Times via Fortune. In June 2026 Reporters Without Borders and journalists' unions lodged complaints over LVMH's purchase of the weekly Challenges, with RSF accusing him of a stranglehold on French business media. His line in the past has been that owning titles is philanthropy.

Money is his other stoush. In July a Paris administrative appeal court reinstated about €22.5 million in extra tax, social charges and wealth-tax liabilities over a roughly €50 million payment from a Belgian holding company, reversing two earlier wins. His spokesman said it will go to the Conseil d'État. It is a tax dispute he is contesting, not a crime.

On the harm test, we found no words of his against LGBTQ+ people, women or migrants. His politics are a rich man's politics: he told Sunday Times readers the wealth-tax push was a desire to destroy the French economy and called its architect a far-left activist. He also said the US welcomed LVMH with open arms while French taxes kept rising. That is a contested position, not hate, and the economist fired back that it echoed Trump-style attacks on research.

The good stuff is real. He pledged €200 million toward rebuilding Notre-Dame after the 2019 fire and built the Fondation Louis Vuitton, both of which he points to in his letter. Whether you read the giving as generosity or as brand-building, Paris got the money. The record on the rest is a mix, so he lands in the middle.

Queue a list of names

One name per line (or split with commas), up to 100 at a time. They're checked a few at a time in the background and land on the scoreboard as they finish. Names already on the board are skipped.

Suggest names

Add names here for the team to review: famous people, characters or companies, one per line (up to 20). We check the ones we pick, and they land on the scoreboard.

Suggested names

Loading…

See what's in line

Loading…

The scoreboard

Everyone checked so far, by score, 10 at the top. Typing a name up top filters the board too. Tap a score to see who's there, and a name for the whole card.

Loading…

Our take, from what the sources we read say on the day we checked. It can miss things; tap a source to read it.